Google Issue a post against link builders!

Cristian Level X³

May 27, 2017, 2:54 am

Write the reason you're deleting this FAQ

Google Issue a post against link builders!

Google has never agreed with any kind of link building techniques, ever since I started learning SEO this was a widely known rule, never exaggerate with your link building or you will get penalized by Google.

First, let's take a walk on the memory lane:

But in the early years of SEO, you would only get penalized if you did some really nasty black had stuff that simply skyrockets your website into the first position. Stuff like link exchange was very common and you could actually reach PR4 by doing only link exchanges. Link exchanges were great! You could see actual results pretty fast and there were a lot of webmaster forums where you could find people to link exchange with.

I remember it didn't really matter the niche of the website the other guy had, I would just link his website into my website's footer so it would be sitewide linking and he/she did the same for my website, of course targeting our main keywords in the anchor text.
But all this fun came to an end with multiple Google algorithm updates and we all had to learn or develop some real SEO skills if we wanted to ever rank anything again.

Google issued a lot of warnings posts over the years, informing people on what is allowed and where are the limits. Of course, being Google, it has never been very specific and SEOs always found themselves wondering on if certain link building techniques they implement may be penalized. I never saw a specific warning coming for Google for a few years now and after the Rank Brain update, I thought maybe I won't see one ever again.

Official Google warning to all webmasters on May 25, 2017:

You can find the original post from Google here.
But I'll break it down below.

Sharing your articles is not forbidden but sharing your articles with the hope of getting lots backlinks it may be a problem:

Google does not discourage these types of articles in the cases when they inform users, educate another site’s audience or bring awareness to your cause or company. However, what does violate Google's guidelines on link schemes is when the main intent is to build links in a large-scale way back to the author’s site.

Google also listed the main factors that can trigger a penalty:

Stuffing keyword-rich links to your site in your articles

Having the articles published across many different sites; alternatively, having a large number of articles on a few large, different sites

Using or hiring article writers that aren’t knowledgeable about the topics they’re writing on

Using the same or similar content across these articles; alternatively, duplicating the full content of articles found on your own site (in which case use of rel=”canonical”, in addition to rel=”nofollow”, is advised)

Rather strange that Google needs to educate the SEO community in 2017 on the use of rel"canonical" and rel="nofollow".
Buttom line: You could get penalized for the links your writers publish the articles on your website if those links are spammy (don't know exactly how can you define that exactly) and do no contain the nofollow tag.

Same goes for duplicate content! Let's say you have an online shop and the product page of EVERY item has some filters that change the URL every time a filter is applied. If the content on the page stays the same, you need to make sure all the filter type pages have a rel="canonical" leading to the original product page without filters. Otherwise, Google will see everything as duplicate content. I personally thought Google had become smart enough to figure out stuff like this on its own, but apparently not.

So what is Google trying to solve with this warning?

I think this is a very specific warning Google had issued and personally, I never remember seeing such direct advice towards link building but also specific on-page optimization points. And it really gets me worried about what the next Google update might do to everyone. I'm pretty someone will take a hit the following months.

This is how Google ends the warning post:

And lastly, if a link is a form of endorsement, and you’re the one creating most of the endorsements for your own site, is this putting forth the best impression of your site? Our best advice in relation to link building is to focus on improving your site’s content and everything--including links--will follow (no pun intended).

In conclusion, if you find yourself in anything that Google said in this last warning start running some spring cleaning and implement canonicals, nofollows and get read of low-quality articles with a spammy link before it will be too late!
I also suggest you take a look at the people creating content on your website and make sure no Google Guidelines are violated by their content.

Other than this, what do you think about this new Google article posted by Google's Webspam Team?

Comments

Please login or sign up to leave a comment

Join

overcast

I think this is just revision of their message in the pass. The base message remains the same. You have to offer some quality. And that is how you're going to get quality back from it. I have found that some of the time it's not safe to be in place where we can link to random things. And also it's wise to link to the right places as well. That's for sure. I wish to know about it.

9 years ago

Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Corzhens

Having your article published in several sites is tantamount to reusing the content and I don’t think that is a good idea. Let’s say you have posted a new blog and that blog can also be seen in another website. Even for a reader, that wouldn’t be a good impression. My understanding with content is that it should be unique which means duplicates are not permitted even if it is you yourself who have shared the article in another site.

8 years ago

Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Avg Time	Count	SQL	Max	Min
0.192763	1	SELECT A.*, C.username, C.profilepicture, C.userlevel, C.ratingcount, C.rating, C.lastlogin, C.ip, C.lip, C.profile_data from posts A, seoclerks.members C WHERE A.active=1 AND A.USERID=C.USERID AND A.sold_out=0 AND category IN (88) AND gtags like'%social%' AND type !=99 AND A.feat=0 AND A.catfeatured_upgrade=0 order by A.lastgigedit desc limit 0, 40	0.192763	0.192763
0.112832	1	SELECT * FROM members WHERE show_freelancer = 1 AND status = 1 AND total_recommendations > 0 AND (skills LIKE '%PNB%') ORDER BY total_recommendations desc LIMIT 0,40	0.112832	0.112832
0.109290	1	SELECT A.wantid, A.title, A.p1, A.maxprice, B.name, B.seo FROM wanttobuy A, categories_wanttobuy B WHERE A.wantid != 22020 AND A.category=B.CATID AND A.active=1 AND (A.tags like '%Website Marketing Facebookaccoun Users Youtubeseoskil%' ) LIMIT 4	0.109290	0.109290

SEOClerks

Google Issue a post against link builders!

Google Issue a post against link builders!

Comments

Please login or sign up to leave a comment

overcast

Corzhens

Invalid SQL

Expensive SQL

Suspicious SQL

Match	Count	SQL	Script
SELECT * FROM members_ledger WHERE ip = ? AND added>=unix_timestamp(NOW())-86400	1	SELECT querystring, added FROM members_ledger WHERE ip = ? AND added>=unix_timestamp(NOW())-86400	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/includes/security.php 398 fetchMemberLedger() include_once()
SELECT * FROM `questions` as q JOIN categories_faq as c ON q.catid=c.CATID WHERE (q.status=1 OR (q.status=2 AND userid='') ) AND q.quesid='22829'	1	SELECT q.*, c.seo as CatSEO, c.name as CatName, c.parentid FROM `questions` as q JOIN categories_faq as c ON q.catid=c.CATID WHERE (q.status=1 OR (q.status=2 AND userid='') ) AND q.quesid='22829'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php 496 () ()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='134'	1	SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='134'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/includes/member.php 445 GetAllUserDetails() ()
SELECT * FROM categories_faq WHERE CATID='36'	1	SELECT CATID, seo, name, metatitle, h2header, metakeywords, metadescription, metaheader, parentid, image_name FROM categories_faq WHERE CATID='36'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() GetCategorySeoFromType()
SELECT * FROM categories_faq WHERE CATID='30'	1	SELECT CATID, seo, name, metatitle, h2header, metakeywords, metadescription, metaheader, parentid, image_name FROM categories_faq WHERE CATID='30'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() GetCategorySeoFromType()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID=134	1	SELECT googleplus_profile FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID=134	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 16914 GetGooglePlusProfileFromId() ()
SELECT * FROM ratings_faq as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=22829 LIMIT 5	1	SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faq as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=22829 LIMIT 5	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()
SELECT * FROM answers a, seoclerks.members b WHERE a.quesid='22829' AND a.userid=b.USERID and b.status='1' AND a.status=1 ORDER BY a.combined_votes DESC, a.date_answered asc	1	SELECT a.answer, a.USERID, a.upvotes, a.downvotes, a.ansid, a.parentid, a.combined_votes, a.date_answered, b.username, b.userlevel, b.profilepicture FROM answers a, seoclerks.members b WHERE a.quesid='22829' AND a.userid=b.USERID and b.status='1' AND a.status=1 ORDER BY a.combined_votes DESC, a.date_answered asc	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php 1245 () ()
SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=124834 LIMIT 5	1	SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=124834 LIMIT 5	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()
SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=157383 LIMIT 5	1	SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=157383 LIMIT 5	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()
UPDATE questions SET total_views = total_views + 1 WHERE quesid='22829'	1	UPDATE questions SET total_views = total_views + 1 WHERE quesid='22829'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 1765 update_Faqviewcount() ()
SELECT * FROM questions WHERE quesid!='22829' AND status='1' AND (question like '%Google Issue post link builders!%' OR question like '%Google%' OR question like '%Issue%' OR question like '%post%' OR question like '%link%' OR question like '%builders!%') -- ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 15	1	SELECT quesid, question, seo, userid FROM questions WHERE quesid!='22829' AND status='1' AND (question like '%Google Issue post link builders!%' OR question like '%Google%' OR question like '%Issue%' OR question like '%post%' OR question like '%link%' OR question like '%builders!%') -- ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 15	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() ()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='9' limit 1	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='9' limit 1	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_member_profilepicture()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='707' limit 1	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='707' limit 1	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_member_profilepicture()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='1' limit 1	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='1' limit 1	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_member_profilepicture()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='632' limit 1	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='632' limit 1	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_member_profilepicture()
SELECT * FROM members_ledger WHERE script='/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php' AND querystring LIKE '%id=22829%' AND added>=UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW())-1200 GROUP BY USERID	1	SELECT USERID, username FROM members_ledger WHERE script='/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php' AND querystring LIKE '%id=22829%' AND added>=UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW())-1200 GROUP BY USERID	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() ()
SELECT * FROM categories	1	SELECT * FROM categories	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() parseRedundantQueriesCache()
select * from categories_software order by name asc	1	select * from categories_software order by name asc	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_GetSoftwareCategories()
select * from categories_wanttobuy order by name asc	1	select * from categories_wanttobuy order by name asc	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_wantcategories()
select * from categories_wanttotrade order by name asc	1	select * from categories_wanttotrade order by name asc	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_tradecategories()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='589438.jpg'	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='589438.jpg'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() getUserProfileImage()
SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='600657.jpg'	1	SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='600657.jpg'	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() getUserProfileImage()
select * from categories_faq order by name asc	1	select * from categories_faq order by name asc	/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_GetFaqCategories()