SEOClerks

I'm A Tad Bit Confused...



Write the reason you're deleting this FAQ

I'm A Tad Bit Confused...

Greetings!

I had received an order for my Tumblr listing (it's $5 or $10 for the extra) and it came up to be a $10 order. So I had provided the Buyer with a link to 3 of my accounts, as I was assuming they purchased an extra. Upon looking at my balance, I had only been paid for the regular service ($5 - 20% = $4).

I checked my emails, and it shown this order came from seoclerk. When I checked out this other site, my service was on there for $10, which is what it was when the order came in... But I didn't get paid for the full amount.

I provided the buyer with the extra service for free?? These other SEOClerk look a like sites are ripping off Sellers, as I had given them an extra at no extra cost to them because I was under the assumption it was an extra, because it has shown a $10 order, but now coincidentally it's showing on the order $5. I know my eyes haven't played tricks on me...

I have sent a support ticket about the issue, but I'm wondering if anything like this happened to anyone else? I need feedback please.


Regards,
NaturalWriter

Comments

Please login or sign up to leave a comment

Join
Asmodeus
I had that same problem. The order page kept showing a different amount each time I looked at it. Sometimes it would show $8, then $4. I thought they ordered the extra, so I completed it as such, but then the revenue page just showed the base amount for the same order, so I have no idea what they really ordered, since the buyer never responded beyond the basic info required.

I'm ok with affiliate sites cloning Seoclerks, as long as their database info matches here, but at seoclerk it does not. Their prices show as twice what it is here, so it gives the seller the impression they made an extra sale, when they actually didn't and, depending on the cache you're viewing as the seller, the order page may show the correct amount or the doubled price for the sale.

It's confusing and can easily lead to sellers providing extras for free that weren't ordered, as is the case with both of us here. I feel sorry for anyone processing a large costly order who finds out they are actually only receiving HALF what they expected to be getting for completing the order.



Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Beverly
Maybe we should all double our prices as it seems double what we are charging is acceptable to some out there.

Just a thought, but maybe the prices being charged here are a little lower than the market will bear. Especially true if others are charging more to profit off our labor.

Greetings!

I had received an order for my Tumblr listing (it's $5 or $10 for the extra) and it came up to be a $10 order. So I had provided the Buyer with a link to 3 of my accounts, as I was assuming they purchased an extra. Upon looking at my balance, I had only been paid for the regular service ($5 - 20% = $4).

I checked my emails, and it shown this order came from seoclerk. When I checked out this other site, my service was on there for $10, which is what it was when the order came in... But I didn't get paid for the full amount.

I provided the buyer with the extra service for free?? These other SEOClerk look a like sites are ripping off Sellers, as I had given them an extra at no extra cost to them because I was under the assumption it was an extra, because it has shown a $10 order, but now coincidentally it's showing on the order $5. I know my eyes haven't played tricks on me...

I have sent a support ticket about the issue, but I'm wondering if anything like this happened to anyone else? I need feedback please.


Regards,
NaturalWriter


I'm not sure what to do about this situation. I think I might have encountered something similar, thinking my order said one thing and later checking back to see that it said something else. This is why I double check fanatically, even before submitting an order to make sure that I don't owe more or that I'm not double delivering.



Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Asmodeus
Maybe we should all double our prices as it seems double what we are charging is acceptable to some out there.

Just a thought, but maybe the prices being charged here are a little lower than the market will bear. Especially true if others are charging more to profit off our labor.

I'm not sure what to do about this situation. I think I might have encountered something similar, thinking my order said one thing and later checking back to see that it said something else. This is why I double check fanatically, even before submitting an order to make sure that I don't owe more or that I'm not double delivering.


The problem is that the pricing here HAS to be lower than what the market will bear, as the sellers compete with each other in the same marketplace. Maybe outside SEOclerks in general a clone site can charge more, as it competes with other markets, but within our closed market we are stuck trying to give the best price to attract budget conscious buyers.

I understand about double checking, and after my previous bad experience with over delivering I now look at the revenue list page, rather than the order page, to see exactly how much I am getting paid when it clears and then deliver accordingly.

If the buyer has an issue with it then they can take it up with support at seoclerk and let them deal with it as a consequence of charging double the price for my work. I'm not getting paid double myself, so why should I do twice the work?



Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Beverly
The problem is that the pricing here HAS to be lower than what the market will bear, as the sellers compete with each other in the same marketplace. Maybe outside SEOclerks in general a clone site can charge more, as it competes with other markets, but within our closed market we are stuck trying to give the best price to attract budget conscious buyers.


I don't compete on price. If others want to charge $1.00 for the same type of service that I'm doing, then so be it. I'm very confident that I can deliver the highest quality, so I don't mind charging what my services are worth.



Are you sure you want to delete this post?

Order Now
Process Time: 0.07789421081543

Possible Duplicate queries found!
MatchCountSQLScript
SELECT * FROM members_ledger WHERE ip = ? AND added>=unix_timestamp(NOW())-864001SELECT querystring, added FROM members_ledger WHERE ip = ? AND added>=unix_timestamp(NOW())-86400

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/includes/security.php 398 fetchMemberLedger() include_once()

SELECT * FROM `questions` as q JOIN categories_faq as c ON q.catid=c.CATID WHERE (q.status=1 OR (q.status=2 AND userid='') ) AND q.quesid='13294'1SELECT q.*, c.seo as CatSEO, c.name as CatName, c.parentid FROM `questions` as q JOIN categories_faq as c ON q.catid=c.CATID WHERE (q.status=1 OR (q.status=2 AND userid='') ) AND q.quesid='13294'

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php 496 () ()

SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='168430'1SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='168430'

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/includes/member.php 445 GetAllUserDetails() ()

SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID=1684301SELECT googleplus_profile FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID=168430

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 16914 GetGooglePlusProfileFromId() ()

SELECT * FROM ratings_faq as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=13294 LIMIT 51SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faq as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=13294 LIMIT 5

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()

SELECT * FROM answers a, seoclerks.members b WHERE a.quesid='13294' AND a.userid=b.USERID and b.status='1' AND a.status=1 ORDER BY a.combined_votes DESC, a.date_answered asc1SELECT a.answer, a.USERID, a.upvotes, a.downvotes, a.ansid, a.parentid, a.combined_votes, a.date_answered, b.username, b.userlevel, b.profilepicture FROM answers a, seoclerks.members b WHERE a.quesid='13294' AND a.userid=b.USERID and b.status='1' AND a.status=1 ORDER BY a.combined_votes DESC, a.date_answered asc

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php 1245 () ()

SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67383 LIMIT 51SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67383 LIMIT 5

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()

SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67384 LIMIT 51SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67384 LIMIT 5

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()

SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67385 LIMIT 51SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67385 LIMIT 5

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()

SELECT * FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67386 LIMIT 51SELECT m.username FROM ratings_faqanswers as r, seoclerks.members as m WHERE r.USERID=m.USERID AND r.upvote=1 AND r.PID=67386 LIMIT 5

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 17159 GetVoters() ()

UPDATE questions SET total_views = total_views + 1 WHERE quesid='13294'1UPDATE questions SET total_views = total_views + 1 WHERE quesid='13294'

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/include/functions/main.php 1765 update_Faqviewcount() ()

SELECT * FROM questions WHERE quesid!='13294' AND status='1' AND (question like '%I\'m Tad Bit Confused...%' OR question like '%Confused...%') -- ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 151SELECT quesid, question, seo, userid FROM questions WHERE quesid!='13294' AND status='1' AND (question like '%I\'m Tad Bit Confused...%' OR question like '%Confused...%') -- ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 15

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() ()

SELECT * FROM members_ledger WHERE script='/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php' AND querystring LIKE '%id=13294%' AND added>=UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW())-1200 GROUP BY USERID 1SELECT USERID, username FROM members_ledger WHERE script='/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/viewfaq.php' AND querystring LIKE '%id=13294%' AND added>=UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW())-1200 GROUP BY USERID

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() ()

SELECT * FROM categories1SELECT * FROM categories

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() parseRedundantQueriesCache()

select * from categories_software order by name asc1select * from categories_software order by name asc

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_GetSoftwareCategories()

select * from categories_wanttobuy order by name asc1select * from categories_wanttobuy order by name asc

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_wantcategories()

select * from categories_wanttotrade order by name asc1select * from categories_wanttotrade order by name asc

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_get_tradecategories()

SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='167023.jpg'1SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='167023.jpg'

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() getUserProfileImage()

SELECT * FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='147.jpg'1SELECT profilepicture FROM seoclerks.members WHERE USERID='147.jpg'

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() getUserProfileImage()

select * from categories_faq order by name asc1select * from categories_faq order by name asc

/opt/clerks-staging/docroot/libraries/adodb5/adodb.inc.php 1899 CacheExecute() insert_GetFaqCategories()

Invalid SQL

count(*)sql1error_msg

Expensive SQL

Tuning the following SQL could reduce the server load substantially
LoadCountSQLMaxMin

Suspicious SQL

The following SQL have high average execution times
Avg TimeCountSQLMaxMin